Written by gkm2020
1 Malaysia can not be achieved if we still think and keep on talking about: (dengan izin)
- Bumiputra and Non-Bumiputra policy;
- One party has absolute power, immunity and superiority than the others;
- One religion above other religion;
- One community more advance and the other remain divided and rural;
- One modernized and the others digitally divided;
- One symbol is greater than the others;
- One quota beyond the others;
- One federalism and the others statesmanship;
- One have high court while others have “syariah court”;
- One have Federal Court and others belittled and/or overrule the “Native Court” powers;
- One believed in democracy and others believe in demo-crazy;
- One physical vote and others via poster vote;
- One democratically nominated and others via monarchy;
- One have more equal rights and others continuously marginalize;
- One veto and others don’t, via special and/or veto appointment;
- One regionally divided and others sub-divisionalized;
- One has more constituencies and other vast area but remained limited;
- One has full control on Federal and State while others remain inequitable;
- One has much humanitarian allocations and others left to beg for mercy;
- One race being subsidize and others not;
- One enforce dynastic approach and others remain colonized;
- One beyond riches and others beyond rags;
- One technically smart and others illiterates;
- One think of building trust and others fired the grassroots headmen for collaborating with opposition;
- One party call and order others to listen, that’s imperialism;
- One Ketuanan Melayu and/or Dayakism; Kadazanism; Mindraf; and others remain marginalize, may cause uneasy;
1 Malaysia policy should serve all and equitably. The 1 Malaysia Government’s enforcement body (Military, Police, MACC, SPR and others) must not be bias and/or prejudice or “one sided” but to serve and honorably discharge their duties with courage, integrity and transparency, and without fear or favor. 1 Malaysia should mean “1 Malaysian”; No Chinese, Malay, Indian, Dayak, and “Bumi and Non-Bumi”. One Malaysia should not be thought of “1 Malaya” and others as Sarawakian; Sabahan; Kelantanese; Johorean; and so on but as “1 Malaysian”.
1 Malaysia vision is a good initiative, a way forward and a unity platform to unite the citizens of this country as Oneness, and to seek continuous peace, harmonization, unification, civilization, modernization, advancement and righteousness. Is 1 Malaysia mean ”One Direction” to uphold, maintain and nationalize Patriotisms, Interdependence, Independence and Internationalism. There’s no 1 Malaysia if there’s no East Malaysia. There’s no “Tanah Melayu” if there’s no native lands, and so is Sarawak or Sabah’s state lands if there’s no “usucapion” and “usufrutus”. Is One Malaysia means diversity?
If our fore fathers can struggle, protect, defend, bleed bloods, sacrifice, enslaved and died for us to achieve 31st August 1957, our “Independence Day”, why can’t we achieve 1 Malaysia today? A dream can be rhetoric too. I believe 1 Malaysia is a new millennia vision goal for Economic Independence for all Malaysian! If our Prime Minister of the day (Dato Seri Najib Razak) calls for “1 Malaysia” why can’t PR’s leader(s) and any other leaders share his vision? We can’t keep on giving others “Red Card”; I believe giving moral and/or productive support is better than pursuing negativity. I believe BN leaders may not have realized their mistakes today if PR failed to create “political tsunami” in the 2008 general election. No Man is a perfect and pure creature. From the day we’re all born into this world from our mother’s womb, we already a sinner and burden to our own parent. If there born and growth there’s always pain, happiness, sadness and tragic, and between that is simply “sins” and “holiness”.
1 Malaysia is not only for Malaysia and/or Malay-Asia or Pan-Asian but “HOME” where each citizen of this country lives for the other and all live for God! Malaysian including Dayak, Orang Asli, Kadazan-Dusun, Malay and other ethnics don’t earned this land but the “country and the government” because land belong to God! There’s no written law of the land in the whole but God’s law for diversity. Laws are only written by Man and Man inherits written knowledge laws from God but Man too abuse God’s law all the times (just like Adam and Eve who disobey God’s law). Man’s Kings, Presidents, Prime Ministers, Heads of State/Provinces, Chief Justice and other figure heads are no God. Is 1 Malaysia means to nationalize “bumiputra” policy on every citizens of this country?
1 Malaysia is one hope and a way forward for every citizen just like the Dayaks hope for unity in “1 Dayak” and alike the Malays all heartedly trying to maintain trust and unity in UMNO while PR trying to consolidate to unite and form a democrat platform just alike the BN. If BN and PR will still remain divided (internal and external) then 1 Malaysia will never be achieved. Unless someone nuke Malaysia and only then we may realize how important unity is? Let us recall some of our historical events: “the Hinduism lands of Nusantara”; “the Great Majapahit Empire”; “the Brooke Colonization”; “the Imperial Japanese invasion of Malaya & Borneo during the 2nd World War”; “theIndonesian Confrontation 1966-1966”; the Communist Insurgency”; “May 13, 1969 riots ” and others, and now the political tsunami and world financial crisis. Stay as 1 Malaysia, we may sustain another millennium; Divided Malaysia and/or Two-Malaysia Policy, we shall fall and marginalize by even more superior nation(s). History may not occur again like 2nd World War Military Warfare or Military Aggression in Malaysia but via Economic Colonization! Either you decide to honor 1 Malaysia concept or not, no one can really decide the best but a least with some achievement. 1 Malaysia concept must not be on individual-to-individual approach but one step at the time. Would 1 Malaysia respect, recognize and help solved native land rights issues?
1 Malaysia must not focus on political motivated platforms to sphere socio-economic development of this country but must include NGOs and “independence commission”. 1 Malaysia must prohibit practicing “semi-caste system” and/or “racial taboo” or “religious taboo” and/or “Malaya Unions” mentality. Is 1 Malaysia means to nationalize “bumiputra” policy on every citizens of this country? Under 1 Malaysia, will our human rights as indigenous peoples would continuously being suppressed, harassed, intimidated, decentralized, relocated and violated in our efforts to protect and defend our cultural heritage, resources, land and environment. Our peoples are being deprived, evicted, culturally assimilated, economically marginalized, and live in poverty and malnutrition as a result of development activities within our lands and territories?
1 Malaysia is the Federation of Malaya and/or “Putrajaya”; its must make every states in “One United States of Malaysia” and not on singlestick approach i.e. regardless of any political party and/or parliamentary constituency that manage the state. In democracy, all the authorities and/or autonomy of all states in Malaysia must be respected and honor. It needs to two to clap. Is 1 Malaysia also meant to privatize national interest and/or a policy of positive discrimination that reserves a proportion of economic, educational and administrative positions?
The existence of Federal Development Department (FDD) or Jabatan Pembangunan Persekutuan (JPP) in some states would show there are no real uniformity, democracy and trust on the state government. FDD is not only interfering in state affairs but would show a strategic “federal colonization” on the state sovereignty. Can 1 Malaysia concept accept “One Coalition Government”; a combination of BN and PR (51/49% or 70/30% stakeholders of One Malaysian Government management portfolio) and/or 1 Malaysia with Two Governments Policy?
1 Malaysia may not be achievable, if we are still thinking of “politico outsider” for “outsider” is no foreigner but with a different concept of politico ideology. Democracy is not one sided political approach; it’s about liberalism and conservative. 1 Malaysia is not about “One BN” state determine the other rural and regional or divisions’ future growth. Is 1 Malaysia also means “one way policy”, “my way policy” and/or like one-sided TV1, 2, 3 news broadcasting and others? 1 Malaysia must build one code of ethic if how we want treat our leaders regardless of which political party they come from.
What if Party A’s representative(s) made an official visit to any Party B’s government departments, will he/she be welcomed, if yes, will he/she be treated well officially as political representative? If not welcomed, does it mean that the representative(s) of Party A is regarded and/or blacklisted as illegal, insurgent and rebel group. But what if Party A holds the government; would Party B welcome such culture and/or policy?
What if Party A’s representative(s) made an official visit to foreign country(s) e.g. to promote trade and the relevant, will Party B’s embassy office in such country welcome them and help coordinate and organize the official visit? If not, does that mean 1 Malaysia do not recognize Party A’s representative(s) as illegal. Is 1 Malaysia (has a slogan “Rakyat Didahulukan, Pencapian Ditumatkan”) also mean any poor or hardcore rakyat; majority are from rural communities and underserved minorities can now benefits and deserved from the national basic humanitarian development (rural water, electricity, ICT, road, identity card, land title, healthcare, agriculture subsidy and others) from the government?
Political cannibalization and invasion has long ago happened in this country not yesterday. 1 Malaysia should stop talking about “outsider” and/or “opposition”. Political election is just like a boxing game the “blue corner” and “red corner” and/or AGM meeting and/or bidding for project tender. A winner takes to become a champion or as a nominated management team and/or contractor to perform at their level best to finish the job. 1 Malaysia is actually all of us just like brothers and sisters regardless of our status, religion and race: ”One for all and All for One”; “United we stand, Separated we fall”; and the “Rukun Negara”. But sometimes, we have seen fathers bully, beaten and/or abused their own children and worse when fathers rope and rape their own children. What would you be thinking?
Under 1 Malaysia, are all the citizen of this beloved nation eligible to apply any loan from Tekun and/or other government institutions without much “red tape” or “condition”? What if a “minority group or an individual” or “NGOs” and/or the “underserved community” request and seeking help from 1 Malaysia Government; will such application be rejected and/or denied if his/her or their letters of support is endorsed/signed by an “opposition representative”? Is Tekun for UMNO or PBB and/or BN? Will 1 Malaysia agenda change the culture of politics in this country? Will 1 Malaysia political policy be more transparent, accountable, open and liberal then ever?
1 Malaysia Government must listen to rakyat voices
1 Malaysia want all citizen of this country remain united to help defend, counter and resolve the world financial crisis that already penetrated into the economic nervous center of this nation. I believe the generous rakyat culture will come forward to contribute and help the government but what if the rakyat seek help from the government; would the 1 Malaysia Government listen to their voices and quickly resolved their “SOS” needs? Denying and/or ignoring their voices would further develop hatred in them. The rational voices would become critical due to dissatisfaction and lack of trust and these voices would certainly tune into criticisms channel. Whose wrong doings? Building political disaster relief and foster trust is very costly and stressful.
Give more value in whatever we do
1 Malaysia cannot be achieved if we still remained in the box and denied others rights. 1 Malaysia can be possibly succeed if we all can come together as “One Family”, compromise and maintain mutual understanding, collaboration, tolerance and respect, and equitability (administer, manage and acceptable economic stakes) in running this country. To succeed, we all must give more value to our services or products and so is the 1 Malaysia Government. More than ever before today, the rakyat are demanding increased in Government value. Don’t fight this fact, but accept it and the government must distance themselves from primitive ideologies and to stay ahead of their external competition. Work smarter, harder, build trust or esprit-de-coupship and be more creative to provide the best value in whatever you do. The fact is, nothing comes; at least nothing good. All has to be fetched.
Conclusion
If “Malaysia Boleh” why not “1 Malaysia”? If Iban/Dayak warriors call for war battle “Agi Idup, Agi Ngelaban” why not this generation calls for economic independence “Agi Idup, Agi Mansang”?? Not just me, your call too. I am always “One” with the rakyat. “Give More Value” is an appropriate motto for 1 Malaysia. More value may be the defining between success and failure. Is 1 Malaysia mean to unite the smart people and elite group only and not 2nd and 3rd class citizens and/or rural communities? We have to admit that we are still struggling to eradicate the remains of the so-called ‘oriental despotism’ here.
<!– –>
By Muller Assen – http://www.theborneopost.com/?p=50796
KUCHING: The contribution of bloggers in Sarawak to promote the 1Malaysia concept will be limited should the government continue to restrict their writings.
Blogger Dr John Brian Anthony said he could not see how they can respond positively to the call by the government to promote the (1Malaysia) concept if their contribution were curtailed.
“I fear that many of our comments would be restricted by the authorities if they think we ‘go overboard’ on the matter,” he said yesterday. Read more
<!– –>
April 25, 2009 · Filed Under General
Quoted from http://anwaribrahimblog.com/2009/04/24/the-anwar-factor/
This article is from FEATURE: The Road Ahead
It can be accessed here.
<!– –>
April 24, 2009 · Filed Under General
Written by Futurist
What are your reasons for not register as elector/voter?
This is to echo Mr. Harrison Ngau Laing on his call for – Register Yourself as Voter. I trust many of our youths yet to register themselves as voter for many reasons only known to them; among others: Read more
<!– –>
Dear friends,
I am very delighted to note the interest shown by all of you on various political subjects concerning our people, religion, NCR land, development policies and projects, our state and country, etc. etc. Read more
<!– –>
April 24, 2009 · Filed Under General
Written by: Dr. John Brian Anthony
1 Malaysia
Few newspaper- reporters call me asking for my comment on Dr. Rais Yatim called to bloggers to write about 1 Malaysia truthfully. I gave my comment to all of them.
However i have a special reservation to test the concept of 1 Malaysia.
Pakataan Rakyat and Orang Asli in Selangor / Perak
PR has evidence that they acted in the interest of Orang Asli by withdrawing the State government appeal over the decision handed by the High Court over Orang Asli land in Dengkil, Selangor.
In Perak they issue land titles to Orang Asli – to show their “inclusive” policy and practice as a Malaysian multi-racial party. Read more
<!– –>
April 24, 2009 · Filed Under General
Taken from: Jetty (Brokenshield)
Awang Tengah says that the government is recognizing native customary rights (NCR) lands as long as the landowners can come up with proof or evidence and the piece of land fulfills the existing land conditions.
“The evidence and conditions must be based on the research and record kept by Land and Survey Department,” the second minister of planning and resource management said.
He cited an agricultural development project purportedly to be implemented on the site where a longhouse, Rumah Chang in Niah, had been built. Read more
<!– –>
April 24, 2009 · Filed Under General
http://www.foodsov.org/resources/rampaging.pdf
Print it – translate it, discuss it, understand it – it is a source of knowledge that we Dayakbaru needed to move forward in our discussion over NCR land development.
Let Dayakbaru become the “Thinking Dayak”.
<!– –>
April 23, 2009 · Filed Under General
Please join in the petition campaign
http://www.foodsov.org/html/petition12.php
To:
Prime Minister of Malaysia
Pejabat Perdana Menteri
Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan
Bangunan Perdana Putri
62502 Putrajaya, Malaysia
Tel: +603 8888 8000 / 8032
Fax: +603 8888 3444
email: ppm@pmo.gov.my
Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman
Chairman
Human Rights Commission of Malaysia
Level 29, Menara Tun Razak
Jalan Raja Laut
50350 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +603 2612 5600
Fax: +603 26125620
Email: humanrights@suhakam.org.my
Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud
Chief Minister of Sarawak
Pejabat Ketua Menteri, Tingkat 22,
Wisma Bapa Malaysia,
Petra Jaya,
93502 Kuching, Sarawak
Malaysia
Tel: +082 – 440801
Fax: +082 – 444566
Email: linu@sarawaknet.gov.my
Dear Sirs,
We are gravely concerned and perturbed by the violation of the rights of indigenous groups commonly known as the Dayaks, which has been taking place for almost the past three decades in Sarawak , the largest state in Malaysia.
This is taking the form of a massive land grab through a legal and systematic means of forcing them to give up their ancestral lands or lands over which they have native customary rights (NCR). These lands are supposed to be recognized by the country’s highest courts and the Sarawak Land Code. However, these lands are given away to companies closely connected with State Government leaders, the political elites and cronies. Read more
<!– –>
April 23, 2009 · Filed Under General
Information Received from: Harrison Ngau Laing
The Sarawak Govt has passed a law called “Forest Concession (Rehabilitation and Development) Fund Ordinance, 1987″. The law authorises the Minister of Planning and Resource Management to impose and collect funds or fees from logging companies for each ton of timbers they extracted, I remember, it was RM1.00 per ton. Read more
<!– –>
April 23, 2009 · Filed Under General
Filed under: Umum | Leave a comment »